1.03 Both years: the tax note gives no movement analysis of the [amount] valuation allowance for the three years presented, Item 15 omits Schedule II, and the unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation stops at two years

Company D · a US-listed cloud communications software company · Compliance or disclosure gap

Compliance gapLowInterpretationFinancial statements, US GAAP and Regulation S-X
Area of the 10-K
Note 14, Income Taxes, and Item 15 financial statement schedules
Year
Both years
Status
Interpretation: Established from the documents; the conclusion rests on a reading of the standard or regulation.
Who acts
Chief Accounting Officer, Tax, SEC Reporting
When
Next Form 10-K (fiscal 2026)

In brief

The 10-K presents three years of income statements, so the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets ([amount]) needs a movement analysis for each of 2025, 2024 and 2023, either as Schedule II or in the notes. Item 15 omits all schedules as 'otherwise included', but the tax note gives only the two year-end balances, a single sentence that the allowance rose by [amount] in 2025, and the percentage effect of the change on the 2024 and 2023 tax rates. The 2025 rate reconciliation charges [amount] for the change, and the note does not show how that relates to the [amount] movement in the balance. The unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation covers 2025 and 2024 only. The same gaps were in the prior-year 10-K.

The evidence, as filed

Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 85
Form 10-K 2025, page 85Three years of audited income statements are filed, so each analysis is due for three years
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 121
Form 10-K 2025, page 121Only two year-end balances of the valuation allowance are given
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 128. Where the disclosure should appear: nothing here
Form 10-K 2025, page 128Where the disclosure should appear: nothing hereWhere the item should appear: Schedule II (valuation and qualifying accounts) for the deferred tax valuation allowance for 2025, 2024 and 2023, or the same analysis in the notes is not shown here
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 127. The prior-year filing
Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 127The prior-year filingPrior year: The 2024 10-K had the same gaps: two balances of the valuation allowance with no movement analysis, and an unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation for 2024 and 2023 only (none for 2022).

What the filing shows, and what the rule requires

What the filing showsWhat the rule requires

Valuation allowance: balances [n] (2025) and [n] (2024), a sentence that it 'increased by [amount]' in 2025, and the percentage effect of the change on the 2024 and 2023 rates (([n]) and ([n])); no opening balance for 2023 and no additions and deductions for any year; Item 15: schedules omitted as 'otherwise included'. Unrecognized tax benefits: reconciliation for 2025 and 2024 only ([n] to [n]; [n] to [n]).

A valuation and qualifying accounts analysis of the deferred tax valuation allowance for each of 2025, 2024 and 2023 (opening balance, additions charged to income, additions charged to other accounts, deductions, closing balance), either as Schedule II or in Note 14; and the unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation for all three years.

The rule

Regulation S-X Rule 5-04(a)(2)

Schedule II of this section shall be filed for each period for which an audited statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed for each person or group.

Version: Text in force at the date of this review · Source: Regulation S-X, 17 CFR 210.5-04 (eCFR, as amended)

Regulation S-X Rule 5-04(c), Schedule II

Schedule II—Valuation and qualifying accounts. The schedule prescribed by § [n]-09 shall be filed in support of valuation and qualifying accounts included in each balance sheet but not included in Schedule VI.

Version: Text in force at the date of this review · Source: Regulation S-X, 17 CFR 210.5-04 (eCFR, as amended)

Why it applies here. Rule 5-04 requires Schedule II for each period for which an audited income statement is filed, in support of every valuation account in the balance sheet; Rule 5-04(b) lets the schedule be omitted only if the notes show the same information, and here they show neither the 2024 and 2023 movements nor the split between amounts charged to income and to other accounts. Separately, the income-taxes standard asks a public business entity for a tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits for each annual period presented; the 2023 column is missing (MD&A gives only the year-end balances).

Why it matters

Readers cannot follow how a valuation allowance of [amount] has moved over the three years presented, or how much of the 2025 change went through income versus other accounts; the tax-position reconciliation is a year short. A staff comment asking for Schedule II or the expanded note in future filings is the realistic outcome.

Exposure

Staff comment letter and a future-filings undertaking (Schedule II or expanded note); no restatement.

Our workings

Fact

the statements of operations cover 2025, 2024 and 2023. Note 14 shows a valuation allowance of [n] and [n] at the two year ends and says it increased by [amount] in 2025; the 2025 rate reconciliation charges [n] for changes in valuation allowances, and the pre-adoption reconciliation gives only the percentage effect of the change on the 2024 and 2023 rates, ([n]) and ([n]). No 2023 opening balance and no additions and deductions for 2024 or 2023 appear in this 10-K. Item 15 says schedules not listed are omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included. The unrecognized-tax-benefit table has two columns.

Our computation

the balance movement is [n] - [n] = [n] against an income-statement charge of [n]; the difference of [n] went through other accounts or other adjustments that the note does not show. This is not an error in either figure; it is the split that Schedule II exists to show.

RequirementGiven in this 10-KStatus
Income-statement years presented2025, 2024, 2023 (3 years)basis for each analysis
Valuation allowance movement 2025[n] - [n] = [n]; text says [amount]Partial: no split of additions and deductions
Rate-reconciliation charge vs balance movement 2025[n] - [n] = [n]not explained: moved through other accounts
Valuation allowance 2024 and 2023rate effect only, ([n])% and ([n])%; no 2023 opening balanceAbsent as a movement
Unrecognized tax benefits reconciliation 2025[n] + [n] + [n] = [n]Given
Unrecognized tax benefits reconciliation 2024[n] + [n] + [n] = [n]Given
Unrecognized tax benefits reconciliation 2023nothingAbsent
Prior year (2024 10-K)
Item2024 10-K
Valuation allowance balances[n] (2024), [n] (2023)
Movement 2024 from balances[n] - [n] = [n]
Unrecognized tax benefits reconciliation2024 and 2023 only ([n] opening for 2024; [n] opening for 2023)

Management’s best defense, and our reply

Management would say the information is 'otherwise included': the valuation allowance balances are in the deferred-tax table, the income-statement effect is in the rate reconciliations for all three years, and the 2023 figures are in the prior-year 10-K on EDGAR. They would add that unrecognized tax benefits of [amount] have no rate effect because of the valuation allowance. However, Rule 5-04 ties Schedule II to each year of income statements filed in this report, not to earlier filings, and Rule 5-04(b) allows omission only when the notes show the same information; the notes give neither the 2024 or 2023 movement of the balance nor the split between amounts charged to income and to other accounts, and the [n] difference in 2025 shows why the split matters. A rate effect in percentages is not a movement analysis.

The fix

  1. Add to Note 14 (or file as Schedule II) a three-year table for the valuation allowance: 'Balance at beginning of year / Charged to income tax expense / Charged to other accounts / Deductions / Balance at end of year', and extend the unrecognized-tax-benefit table to three years.

Evidence relied on

#What it showsTypeWhere
1Three years of audited income statements are filed, so each analysis is due for three yearsDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 85
2Only two year-end balances of the valuation allowance are givenDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 121
3The only movement given is a single sentence on the 2025 increaseDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 121
4The income-statement charge for 2025 ([n]) differs from the balance movement ([n])DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 119
5For 2024 and 2023 only the percentage effect of the change on the tax rate is given, not the movement of the balanceDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 120
6The unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation has two columns, 2025 and 2024DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 122
7Reconciliation line for 2025 and 2024DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 122
8Reconciliation line for 2025 and 2024DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 122
9Closing balances for 2025 and 2024DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 122
10Schedule II is omitted on the basis that the information is elsewhereDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 128

Absence check

Document
Form 10-K 2025
Where it would appear
2. Financial Statement Schedules
What is missing
Schedule II (valuation and qualifying accounts) for the deferred tax valuation allowance for 2025, 2024 and 2023, or the same analysis in the notes
Pages looked at
p.118-123 and [n] (images); whole 10-K text
Result
'Schedule II', 'Valuation and Qualifying' and 'valuation allowance decreased' do not occur. 'valuation allowance increased' and 'Less: valuation' hit only p.121: the two year-end balances and the one- increase. 'Change in valuation allowance' hits only p.120: the percentage effect on the 2024 and 2023 rates. The wider term 'valuation allowance' also hits MD&A (p.64, [n]: policy, rate drivers, the non-GAAP tax rate and the rounded [amounts] balances) and the policy note (p.90, [n]). None gives a 2023 opening balance or additions and deductions for any year.

Absence check

Document
Form 10-K 2025
Where it would appear
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
What is missing
the 2023 column of the unrecognized-tax-benefit reconciliation
Pages looked at
p.118-123 (images); whole 10-K text
Result
'Unrecognized tax benefits—January' and 'reconciliation of the beginning and ending' hit only p.122 (the two-column table for 2025 and 2024). 'unrecognized tax benefit' also hits p.77 (MD&A: year-end balances of [amounts], no movement) and p.119 (the 2025 rate-reconciliation line). None gives the 2023 reconciliation.

Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s public SEC filings, without the company’s involvement, to show how a 10-K Pre-filing Check reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other attestation or assurance engagement, and not legal advice. An SEC-style question is a question, not a conclusion.

Want this on your own 10-K, before you file?

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K Pre-filing Check.

Your next 10-K will be in draft before the audit is done.
Have it read before you file.

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K check. Drafts only under NDA, inside your insider trading policy.