5.02 The segment policy still gives the decision maker the former title 'President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson'

Company F · a US-listed networking equipment company · Drafting slip

DraftingLowEstablishedFinancial statements, US GAAP and Regulation S-X
Area of the 10-K
Notes: Note 1 Segment Reporting policy
Year
Latest 10-K
Status
Established: Established from the company’s own documents; the requirement is clear.
Who acts
SEC Reporting
When
Next Form 10-Q, and the next Form 10-K (fiscal 2026)

In brief

The segment policy names the chief operating decision maker as '[wording masked]', carried over from the prior-year report. The signature page and Item 9B of the same report give that officer's title as Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson, and another officer signs as President.

The evidence, as filed

Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 96
Form 10-K 2025, page 96Item 9B gives the Chief Executive Officer's title without President
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 103
Form 10-K 2025, page 103Signature page: the principal executive officer signs without the President title
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 103
Form 10-K 2025, page 103Signature page: another director signs as President

2 further page extracts: screenshot withheld to protect the company’s identity. The rows below say what each shows.

What the filing shows, and what the rule requires

What the filing showsWhat the rule requires

Note 1: '[wording masked]'

'our Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board', the title in force at the year end

The rule

ASC 280-10-50-21(c) and 280-10-50-29 (as amended by ASU 2023-07)

Summary; FASB/IFRS text is copyrighted Disclose the CODM's title and position and explain how the CODM uses reported segment profit measures to assess performance and allocate resources.

Version: Text in force at the date of this review · Source: FASB Accounting Standards Codification, ASC 280-10-50-21(c) and 280-10-50-29 (as amended by ASU 2023-07); paraphrase

Why it applies here. the policy sentence was not updated. The decision maker is still identifiable, so this is a wording correction only.

Why it matters

None beyond presentation; the decision maker remains identifiable.

Exposure

Drafting correction only.

Our workings

Fact

the segment policy uses the title the Chief Executive Officer held when the prior-year report was written (prior-year p.85).

Item 9B and the signature page give the title as Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson, another director signs as President, Chief Technology Officer, and the company's Forms 8-K of June and [date] appointed two other officers President; the 2026 proxy statement says the Chief Executive Officer served as President until [date].

Management’s best defense, and our reply

Management would say the decision maker is plainly the Chief Executive Officer, as it told the SEC staff in 2024, and that only one officer is both Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson, so the extra word misleads nobody. That is right, which is why the point is only a wording correction: the title printed is one that officer no longer holds and two other officers now do.

The fix

  1. Replace the words with: 'Our chief operating decision maker [wording masked], who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis ...'.

Evidence relied on

#What it showsTypeWhere
1Segment policy names the decision maker by the former combined titleDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 78
2Item 9B gives the Chief Executive Officer's title without PresidentDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 96
3Signature page: the principal executive officer signs without the President titleDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 103
4Signature page: another director signs as PresidentDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 103
5[date] Form 8-K: the Chief Technology Officer made PresidentDocument
62026 proxy statement: the Chief Executive Officer held the President title only until [date]Document
7Prior-year policy carried the same sentence, when the title was correctDocumentForm 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85

Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s public SEC filings, without the company’s involvement, to show how a 10-K Pre-filing Check reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other attestation or assurance engagement, and not legal advice. An SEC-style question is a question, not a conclusion.

Want this on your own 10-K, before you file?

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K Pre-filing Check.

Your next 10-K will be in draft before the audit is done.
Have it read before you file.

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K check. Drafts only under NDA, inside your insider trading policy.