5.01 The statement of stockholders' equity ends with a footnote rule and a stray full stop but no footnote

Company F · a US-listed networking equipment company · Drafting slip

DraftingLowEstablishedFinancial statements, US GAAP and Regulation S-X
Area of the 10-K
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (p.71)
Year
Latest 10-K
Status
Established: Established from the company’s own documents; the requirement is clear.
Who acts
SEC Reporting
When
Next Form 10-K (fiscal 2026)

In brief

Below the closing balance of the statement of stockholders' equity the page prints a footnote separator line followed by a lone full stop, with no footnote text. The prior-year statement used that line for its stock-split footnote; the footnote was removed this year but the separator was left behind.

The evidence, as filed

Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 71
Form 10-K 2025, page 71Separator line followed by a lone full stop under the closing balance, with no footnote text
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 77
Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 77In the prior year the same separator introduced the stock-split footnote

What the filing shows, and what the rule requires

What the filing showsWhat the rule requires

A footnote separator line and a stray full stop under the statement, with no footnote and no footnote marker in the table.

Remove the separator line and the full stop.

Why it matters

Cosmetic only; the page looks unfinished in the filed statements.

Exposure

No consequence beyond presentation.

Our workings

Fact

the equity statement on p.71 ends with a separator line and a single full stop before the standard sentence that the notes are an integral part of the statements; no column heading or line in the table carries a footnote marker. In the prior-year Form 10-K the same line introduced the footnote explaining that prior-period share figures were adjusted for the stock split.

Our inference

the footnote was deleted when it was no longer needed, and the separator and its punctuation were left in the filed document. No figure is affected.

Management’s best defense, and our reply

The line and the full stop are layout residue that no reader would act on, and every figure on the page is correct. The answer: that is why the point is only a drafting slip, recorded so it is cleared in the next filing.

The fix

  1. Delete the separator line and the stray full stop under the statement of stockholders' equity.

Evidence relied on

#What it showsTypeWhere
1Separator line followed by a lone full stop under the closing balance, with no footnote textDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 71
2In the prior year the same separator introduced the stock-split footnoteDocumentForm 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 77

Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s public SEC filings, without the company’s involvement, to show how a 10-K Pre-filing Check reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other attestation or assurance engagement, and not legal advice. An SEC-style question is a question, not a conclusion.

Want this on your own 10-K, before you file?

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K Pre-filing Check.

Your next 10-K will be in draft before the audit is done.
Have it read before you file.

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K check. Drafts only under NDA, inside your insider trading policy.