2.02 Equity compensation plan table counts only stock options; outstanding performance and restricted stock units are left out of column (a)

Company A · a US-listed consumer leisure company · Compliance or disclosure gap

Compliance gapLowEstablishedGovernance, controls and certifications
Area of the 10-K
Part III, Item 12: equity compensation plan information table
Year
Both years
Status
Established: Established from the company’s own documents; the requirement is clear.
Who acts
General Counsel, SEC Reporting
When
Next Form 10-K (fiscal 2026)

In brief

The Item 12 table shows [n] securities to be issued on exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights, at a weighted-average price of [amount]. Both figures are the stock options alone (Note 7: [n] options outstanding at [amount]). Note 7 also shows [n] restricted stock units and [n] performance stock units outstanding, payable in common stock, which are neither in the table nor footnoted. The SEC staff's interpretation of Item 201(d) says shares issuable under performance share awards must be reported in column (a), with a footnote on column (b). The omitted units are [n]% of the column, and the prior-year table was built the same way.

The evidence, as filed

Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 86
Form 10-K 2025, page 86Item 12 table: column (a) [n] at [amount]
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85
Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85Prior-year table: column (a) equals the [n] options alone
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 86. Where the disclosure should appear: nothing here
Form 10-K 2025, page 86Where the disclosure should appear: nothing hereWhere the item should appear: the outstanding restricted and performance stock units in column (a) of the equity compensation plan table, or a footnote explaining their exclusion is not shown here
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85. The prior-year filing
Form 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85The prior-year filingPrior year: The prior-year table also showed only the options ([n] at [amount]), so the point covers both years.

What the filing shows, and what the rule requires

What the filing showsWhat the rule requires

Column (a) [n] = options only; restricted stock units ([n]) and performance stock units ([n]) payable in shares are omitted without a footnote, in both years.

Column (a) including all outstanding units to be settled in shares ([n] + [n] + [n] = [n]), with a footnote describing the units and stating that the weighted-average exercise price in column (b) excludes them (and, if useful, that performance units are counted at target).

The rule

Regulation S-K Item 201(d)(2)(i)

The number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (column (a));

Version: Text in force at the date of this review · Source: 17 CFR 229.201(d)(2)(i), as amended

SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Regulation S-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation, Question [n]

Shares that may be issued under performance share awards if specified targets are met ( i.e. , an award denominated in shares has been made, but no shares will be issued until the performance targets are met), and shares credited as phantom shares under a deferred compensation plan that will be issued as actual shares upon termination of employment, must be reported in column (a).

Version: Text in force at the date of this review · Source: SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations: Regulation S-K, Question [n] ([date])

Why it applies here. Item 201(d)(2)(i) asks in column (a) for securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights. The staff's Regulation S-K interpretation on performance share awards answers the grey area for full-value awards: shares that may be issued under performance share awards, and phantom shares that will be issued as actual shares, must be reported in column (a), with a footnote explaining that column (b) does not take them into account. Restricted stock units settled in shares are the same kind of award denominated in shares with no shares yet issued. By contrast, the companion interpretation on restricted stock excludes shares already issued subject to forfeiture, so the [n] restricted shares in Note 7 are rightly left out. The omission therefore concerns the units only, and it understates the dilution the table exists to show.

Why it matters

Readers using the table to gauge dilution from equity plans see [n] fewer shares than will be issued if the units vest (at target), and column (b) carries no footnote.

Exposure

No fine. The realistic consequence is a staff comment asking for the units to be added to column (a), with a footnote, in future filings.

Our workings

Fact

the Item 12 table gives [n] in column (a) and [amount] in column (b); Note 7 gives [n] options outstanding at a weighted-average exercise price of [amount], so the column is the options alone.

Note 7 shows [n] restricted stock units and [n] performance stock units outstanding at [date], both payable in common stock.

Our computation

[n] + [n] = [n] units, [n]% of column (a) (workings).

ItemThousand unitsSource
Options outstanding (column (a) as printed)[n]Note 7
Restricted stock units outstanding[n]Note 7
Performance stock units outstanding[n]Note 7
Units not in column (a)[n] + [n] = [n]
Share of column (a)[n] / [n] = [n]%
Column (a) including the units[n] + [n] = [n]

Management’s best defense, and our reply

Column (a) speaks of securities issued 'upon the exercise' of options, warrants and rights; restricted and performance stock units are not exercised, so the company can read the column as limited to exercisable instruments, and column (b) cannot include them anyway. The performance units may also settle at fewer shares than target, and the units are fully described in Note 7. However, the staff's published interpretation [n] says shares issuable under performance share awards must be in column (a), with a footnote on column (b) and, where target overstates dilution, a footnote saying so; the units are shares to be issued, unlike issued restricted stock, so the company's reading is not one the staff accepts.

The fix

  1. Include the units in column (a) and footnote column (b): 'Includes [n] restricted stock units and [n] performance stock units (at target); the weighted-average exercise price excludes these units, which have no exercise price.'

Evidence relied on

#What it showsTypeWhere
1Item 12 table: column (a) [n] at [amount]DocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 86
2Note 7: options outstanding [n] at [amount] - the same figures as the tableDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 73
3Note 7: [n] restricted stock units outstandingDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 74
4Restricted stock units are settled in common stockDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 74
5Note 7: [n] performance stock units outstandingDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 75
6Prior-year table: column (a) equals the [n] options aloneDocumentForm 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 85
7Note 7: [n] shares of restricted stock outstanding, already issued subject to forfeiture and rightly outside the tableDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 74

Absence check

Document
Form 10-K 2025
Where it would appear
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
What is missing
the outstanding restricted and performance stock units in column (a) of the equity compensation plan table, or a footnote explaining their exclusion
Pages looked at
p.86 (Item 12 table and text), p.72-75 (Note 7)
Result
'restricted stock units' and 'performance stock units' hit only p.62-63 (earnings per share policy and dilution table), p.72 (treasury share reissue) and p.74-75 (Note 7 award activity), none of which is the Item 12 table; 'warrants and rights' hits only the Item 12 column headings on p.86; 'excludes restricted' has no hit, so no footnote explains the exclusion.

Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s public SEC filings, without the company’s involvement, to show how a 10-K Pre-filing Check reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other attestation or assurance engagement, and not legal advice. An SEC-style question is a question, not a conclusion.

Want this on your own 10-K, before you file?

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K Pre-filing Check.

Your next 10-K will be in draft before the audit is done.
Have it read before you file.

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K check. Drafts only under NDA, inside your insider trading policy.