1.07 The tax note no longer says that no deferred tax is provided on outside basis differences of foreign subsidiaries, though a risk factor still relies on indefinite reinvestment

Company F · a US-listed networking equipment company · SEC-style question

QuestionLowInterpretationFinancial statements, US GAAP and Regulation S-X
Area of the 10-K
Notes: income taxes (Note 8), unremitted foreign earnings
Year
Latest 10-K
Status
Interpretation: Established from the documents; the conclusion rests on a reading of the standard or regulation.
Who acts
Chief Accounting Officer, Tax Director, SEC Reporting
When
Next Form 10-K (fiscal 2026)

In brief

Last year the tax note said the company had not provided for the tax effect of outside basis differences of its foreign subsidiaries because of plans for future reinvestment, and that the tax consequences were not practicable to determine. This year the first sentence is gone and only the 'not practicable' sentence remains, so the note no longer says which temporary differences carry no deferred tax liability or why. A risk factor still refers to the company's [wording masked].

The evidence, as filed

Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 92
Form 10-K 2025, page 92Deferred tax liability on foreign earnings
Masked extract: Form 10-K 2025, page 90
Form 10-K 2025, page 90Foreign pre-tax income

6 further page extracts: screenshot withheld to protect the company’s identity. The rows below say what each shows.

What the filing shows, and what the rule requires

What the filing showsWhat the rule requires

The note says most undistributed foreign earnings are previously taxed and that the future tax consequences of remitting them are not practicable to determine; it does not say that a deferred tax liability has not been recognized on outside basis differences or on what basis.

A description of the temporary differences of foreign subsidiaries on which no deferred tax liability is recognized (outside basis differences), the event that would make them taxable (remittance or sale), and the unrecognised liability or the statement that its determination is not practicable.

The rule

ASC 740-30-25-17 and 740-30-50-2 (as amended by ASU 2023-09)

ASC 740-30-25-17; ASU 2023-09

Summary; FASB/IFRS text is copyrighted A description of the temporary differences of foreign subsidiaries on which no deferred tax liability is recognized (outside basis differences), the event that would make them taxable (remittance or sale), and the unrecognised liability or the statement that its determination is not practicable.

Paragraphs: ASC 740-30-25-17, ASU 2023-09, as codified for the fiscal year under review.

Why it applies here. the income-tax topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), as amended by the 2023 income-tax disclosure update, still requires a description of the types of temporary differences on which a deferred tax liability is not recognized under the foreign-subsidiary exception and of the events that would make them taxable, and the amount of the unrecognised liability or a statement that it is not practicable; the update removed only the cumulative amount of those differences. Without the dropped sentence, the 'not practicable' statement has nothing to attach to, and a reader cannot tell whether the exception is still claimed or whether the [n] liability now covers all foreign earnings.

Why it matters

Readers cannot tell whether the company still applies the indefinite-reinvestment exception, and the remaining 'not practicable' sentence reads as unsupported.

How often the SEC staff raises this. In 1,100 SEC staff comment letters on fiscal 2023 and 2024 Forms 10-K, released January 2025 to October 2026, income taxes drew 23 of the 1,774 numbered comments (1.3%): topic 17 of 25 by frequency.

Exposure

A question for management; if the exception is still applied, the realistic consequence is restoring the sentence in the next Form 10-K.

Our workings

Fact

the fiscal 2024 Form 10-K tax note read that the company had not provided for any remaining tax effect of limited outside basis differences of its foreign subsidiaries based upon plans of future reinvestment, followed by the 'not practicable' sentence. The fiscal 2025 note keeps the sentences on previously taxed earnings and on practicability but omits the reinvestment sentence. The deferred tax table still carries a liability for US tax on foreign earnings of [n] (2024: [n]), and the income-tax risk factor still mentions a change in the [wording masked]. Foreign pre-tax income was [n] in 2025.

Our computation

none is possible; no amount of unrecognised liability or of outside basis difference is given in either year.

ItemFiscal 2024 note (Form 10-K 2024 (prior year))Fiscal 2025 note (Form 10-K 2025)
Previously taxed earnings sentenceGivenGiven
No deferred tax provided on outside basis differences, based on reinvestment plansGiven (Form 10-K 2024 (prior year) p.100)Absent
Unrecognised liability not practicable to determineGivenGiven
Deferred tax liability: US tax on foreign earnings([n]) at [date]([n]) at [date]; [n] - [n] = [n] decrease
Foreign pre-tax income[n] (2024)[n] (2025)

Management’s best defense, and our reply

Management would say that after the 2017 tax reform almost all foreign earnings are previously taxed, so the remaining outside basis differences are limited and their tax effect immaterial. They would point out that the deferred tax liability on foreign earnings already captures the main US tax on those earnings. They would add that the 2023 disclosure update removed the cumulative-amount requirement and that the note still states that the tax consequences of remittance are not practicable to determine, which tells readers no liability is recorded. The defense is tenable, which is why this is a question. However, the description of the unrecognised differences is still required, the company gave it last year, and its own risk factor still relies on indefinite reinvestment.

The fix

  1. Restore: 'We have not provided for the tax effect, if any, of the outside basis differences of our foreign subsidiaries, which we intend to reinvest indefinitely; these would become taxable on a distribution or sale. The determination of the unrecognised deferred tax liability is not practicable.'

Question for the company

Does the company still assert indefinite reinvestment for the outside basis differences of its foreign subsidiaries? If so, why was the sentence removed from the tax note; if not, does the [n] deferred tax liability now cover all taxes expected on remittance, and how does that fit the risk factor's reference to indefinite reinvestment?

Evidence relied on

#What it showsTypeWhere
1This year's note keeps the previously-taxed sentenceDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 92
2The 'not practicable' statement remains, with nothing before it saying no liability is recognizedDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 92
3Deferred tax liability on foreign earningsDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 92
4Risk factor still relies on indefinite reinvestmentDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 39
5Foreign pre-tax incomeDocumentForm 10-K 2025, page 90
6Prior-year sentence now droppedDocumentForm 10-K 2024 (prior year), page 100

Absence check

Document
Form 10-K 2025
Where it would appear
U.S. tax law generally requires
What is missing
the statement that no deferred tax liability is recognized on outside basis differences of foreign subsidiaries because of reinvestment plans, and the event that would make them taxable
Pages looked at
p.39 (risk factors), 56-66 (MD&A), [n], 94-97 (tax policy and note)
Result
'outside basis' and 'not provided' have no hits. 'reinvest' and 'indefinite' hit only the risk factor on p.39 and, for 'indefinite', the state credit carryforward sentence on p.92. 'permanently' hits a cybersecurity risk factor on p.35. 'foreign earnings' hits the risk factor, the MD&A tax description, the GILTI policy, the 2024 rate reconciliation and the deferred-tax table; none states whether a liability is recognized on outside basis differences.

Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s public SEC filings, without the company’s involvement, to show how a 10-K Pre-filing Check reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other attestation or assurance engagement, and not legal advice. An SEC-style question is a question, not a conclusion.

Want this on your own 10-K, before you file?

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K Pre-filing Check.

Your next 10-K will be in draft before the audit is done.
Have it read before you file.

Start with three free findings on your latest 10-K, or book a fixed-price 10-K check. Drafts only under NDA, inside your insider trading policy.