1.17 The [investee] fundraising is disclosed as a material event with neither an estimate of its effect nor a statement that an estimate cannot be made
UK Company B · a UK-listed technology and logistics group · Regulator-style question
In brief
Note 5.5 reports that [investee] raised [amount] at an [amount] post-money valuation on [date], the day before the accounts were approved, and says this is expected to cause a material increase in the carrying value of the Group's [n]% holding (carried at [amount]). The note gives no estimate of the increase and does not say that an estimate cannot be made; it says only that no fair value assessment has been undertaken. The half-year results later put the increase at [amount]. We ask how the note meets the standard's requirement for material non-adjusting events.
The evidence, as filed
Further pages withheld to protect the company’s identity (two): Annual Report 2025, page 259; Annual Report 2025, page 224. Their wording or layout could lead back to the company even with names and figures masked; the evidence list below records what each page shows.
Names, figures, dates, logos and any wording that could be searched back to the company are boxed out in grey; the point is highlighted in yellow.
What the report shows, and what the rule requires
| What the annual report shows | What the rule requires |
|---|---|
| What the annual report shows The post-balance sheet events note: [wording masked]' and the event '[wording masked] [n]% [investee] holding carried at [amount]; no amount and no statement that an estimate cannot be made. | What the rule requires For a material non-adjusting event, the nature of the event plus either an estimate of its financial effect (for example a range) or an express statement that such an estimate cannot be made, with the reason. |
What we checked: Note 5.5 and the Strategic report repeat of the same paragraph; Note 3.6 holding and carrying amount; the half-year results published on [date]; the 2024 report (no post-balance sheet events).
The rule
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, paragraph 21
Version relied on: UK-adopted international accounting standards (UK Endorsement Board), as in force for financial years beginning in or after January 2025
For each material category of non-adjusting event after the year end, the accounts must describe the event and estimate its financial effect, or say that no estimate can be made.
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, paragraph 22(g)
Version relied on: UK-adopted international accounting standards (UK Endorsement Board), as in force for financial years beginning in or after January 2025
Unusually large movements in asset prices or exchange rates after the year end are an example of a non-adjusting event that may need disclosure.
Why it applies here: by calling the event material the Group brings it within the disclosure requirement for material non-adjusting events, which asks for an estimate of the financial effect or a statement that an estimate cannot be made. '[wording masked]' describes what was done, not whether an estimate could be made, and the post-money valuation and the stated holding gave an observable starting point.
Why it matters
Readers were told of a material gain on a Level 3 investment without any amount, although the standard requires either an amount or an express statement that none can be given.
Exposure
A question for the Company; no penalty is engaged. If the FRC's Corporate Reporting Review raised it, the usual outcome would be an undertaking to improve the next report.
Our workings
Note 5.5 states that on [date] [investee] raised [amount] in a Series D round at a post-money valuation of [amount] and that, while [wording masked], the event is expected to cause a material increase in the carrying value of its investment. The Company balance sheet records approval on [date]. Note 3.6 shows a [n]% holding carried at [amount] at fair value through other comprehensive income. The half-year results for the 26 weeks to [date] report a [amount] increase to [amount] from this fundraise.
the later increase equals [n]% of the year-end carrying amount (workings).
Whether a one-day interval made any estimate impracticable is a matter only management can confirm.
| Item | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| [investee] holding at [date] | [n]% | Note 3.6 |
| Carrying amount at [date] (£m) | [n] | Note 3.6 |
| Carrying amount at [date] (£m) | [n] | Half-year results |
| Increase from the Series D round (£m) | [n] - [n] = [n] | Half-year results state [n] |
| Increase as % of year-end carrying amount | [n] / [n] = [n]% | computed |
Management’s best defence, and our reply
The round was announced on [date] and the accounts were approved the next day, so no valuation under the option pricing model could be completed in time; the sentence that no fair value assessment had been undertaken was intended to tell readers that no estimate was available. The note also gave the post-money valuation and Note 3.6 gave the holding, so readers had what they needed to form their own view, and the gain goes through other comprehensive income, not profit. However, the standard asks for an estimate or an express statement that one cannot be made, and the note gives neither in terms; the defence is reasonable on timing, which is why this is put as a question.
The fix
- In future reports, give a range for a material post-year-end fair value effect, or state: 'An estimate of the financial effect cannot be made because ...'.
Question for the company
At approval on [date], could the Group have given an estimate or range of the effect of the [investee] Series D round on its [n]% holding, and if not, why did the note not state that an estimate could not be made?
Evidence relied on
| # | What it shows | Type | Where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The event, its date and the round size and valuation | Document | Annual Report 2025, page 259 |
| 2 | The Group calls the effect material but gives no estimate and no statement that one cannot be made | Document | Annual Report 2025, page 259 |
| 3 | Holding of [n]% carried at [amount] at [date] | Document | Annual Report 2025, page 224 |
| 4 | Approval date, the day after the fundraising | Document | Annual Report 2025, page 260 |
| 5 | Half-year results published [date] quantify the effect at [amount] | Document |
Prepared by Pramanex from the company’s published annual reports, without the company’s involvement, to show how an annual report review reads. The company is not named, and nothing on this page is a statement about any identifiable company. Observations are not an audit, review or other assurance engagement, and not legal advice. A regulator-style question is a question, not a conclusion.
Want this on your own annual report, before it is published?
Start with three free findings on your latest published annual report, or talk to us about a fixed-fee pre-publication review.
Your annual report will be in draft before the year-end audit.
Have it read before it is published.
Under NDA, with our reviewer on your insider list under UK MAR.